-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove AbstractNdarrayUDF #415
Conversation
These methods will have to be overridden by all UDFs.
The directory is in the udfs directory so the extra udfs is redundant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall LGTM
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ | |||
[run] | |||
omit = | |||
eva/parser/evaql/* | |||
eva/udfs/abstract_udf.py |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why omit the abstract_udf
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Abstract classes cannot be directly tested so including them in coverage reports is misleading. Adding/removing abstract methods does not actually alter test coverage.
setup
andforward
abstract methods toAbstractUDF