resource as literal or uri, when importing DC record as rdf/xml

[pvgenuchten]

When importing

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020175">
    <dc:identifier>10.1002/eqe.3286</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references>http://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3286</dct:references>
    <dc:type>document</dc:type>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

vs

<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dct="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020175">
    <dc:identifier>10.1002/2016WR020175</dc:identifier>
    <dct:references rdf:resource="http://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020175"/>
    <dc:type>document</dc:type>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

the first works fine, the second returns an empty reference element, can we support both
the second may be the optimal choice considering https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/terms/references/

[github-actions]

This Issue has been inactive for 90 days. In order to manage maintenance burden, it will be automatically closed in 7 days.

[pvgenuchten]

Keep open, working on it

[geographika]

@pvgenuchten - do you have a Python snippet that calls a service returning data in the second format?

[pvgenuchten]

I’ll try to find some examples

[pvgenuchten]

I found this example at https://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/resources/rdf/examples/2/

<rdf:RDF
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-rdf-syntax#"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.0/"
  xmlns:dcq="http://purl.org/dc/qualifiers/1.0/">
  <rdf:Description about="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue13/main/">
    <dc:Title>
      What do National Libraries do in the Age of the Internet?
    </dc:Title>
    <dc:Creator>Maurice Line</dc:Creator>
    <dc:Subject>
      National Library; Internet; Library Services; British
      Library Document Supply Centre; central collection;
      distributed collection; national bibliography; future of
      national libraries; archiving; electronic publication
    </dc:Subject>
    <dc:Description>
      Discusses whether or not national libraries have a role in
      the age of the Internet, and if they will shrink or expand?
      Or if their functions will become obsolete or be taken over
      by other bodies.
    </dc:Description>
    <dc:Type>Text.Article</dc:Type>
    <dc:Format>text/html</dc:Format>
    <dc:Relation>
      <rdf:Description>
        <dcq:RelationType
	  rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/vocabularies/RelationTypes/v1.0/IsPartOf"/>
        <rdf:value resource="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/"/>
      </rdf:Description>
    </dc:Relation>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

[geographika]

@pvgenuchten - do you have a Python snippet to show this issue that I can turn into a test?

[github-actions]

This Issue has been inactive for 90 days. In order to manage maintenance burden, it will be automatically closed in 7 days.

[github-actions]

This Issue has been closed due to there being no activity for more than 90 days.