Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor description of sf interfaces, big it up #743

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Feb 5, 2022
Merged
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Update outdated exercise 1
  • Loading branch information
Robinlovelace committed Feb 4, 2022
commit 984bb24469f17c84f9c32831bbb70af854a9dcd5
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion _01-ex.Rmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ E1. Think about the terms 'GIS'\index{GIS}, 'GDS' and 'geocomputation' described

E2. Provide three reasons for using a scriptable language such as R for geocomputation instead of using a graphical user interface (GUI) based GIS such as QGIS\index{QGIS}.

E3. Name two advantages and two disadvantages of using mature vs recent packages for geographic data analysis\index{geographic data analysis} (for example **sp** vs **sf**\index{sf}, or **raster** vs **terra**).
E3. Think about real world problems you would like to solve with help from geographic data. Try sketching a workflow, with rectangles representing datsets and ovals representing methods/processes to transform them, with a pen and paper or a digital sketching tool such as Excalidraw.

<!--toDo: rl -->
<!--add solutions!-->