Skip to content

Comments

fix: item hit test recursive logic#1406

Open
wumaolinmaoan wants to merge 10 commits intodevfrom
hotfix/item-hit-test
Open

fix: item hit test recursive logic#1406
wumaolinmaoan wants to merge 10 commits intodevfrom
hotfix/item-hit-test

Conversation

@wumaolinmaoan
Copy link
Contributor

@wumaolinmaoan wumaolinmaoan commented Feb 13, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Code formatting and indentation improvements.

@wumaolinmaoan wumaolinmaoan requested a review from yiiqii February 13, 2026 10:23
@wumaolinmaoan wumaolinmaoan changed the title fix: item hittest recursive logic fix: item hit test recursive logic Feb 13, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Code formatting adjustments applied to the hit-test dispatch logic in CompositionComponent, including re-indentation and brace repositioning. The control flow and functional behavior remain unchanged.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Code Formatting
packages/effects-core/src/components/composition-component.ts
Re-indentation and brace adjustments to hit-test dispatch logic; no functional changes to control flow or hitTest delegation behavior.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops through indented code,
Where braces dance along the road,
No logic changed, just spacing neat,
The hitTest still performs its beat! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'fix: item hit test recursive logic' directly references the file being modified (composition-component.ts with hit-test dispatch logic) and accurately describes the focus area, though the summary indicates only formatting changes with no functional modifications. Clarify whether this is truly a functional fix or a refactoring. If only formatting/indentation changes, consider retitling to 'refactor:' or 'style:' instead of 'fix:' to accurately reflect the nature of the changes.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Merge Conflict Detection ✅ Passed ✅ No merge conflicts detected when merging into main

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch hotfix/item-hit-test

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@wumaolinmaoan wumaolinmaoan changed the base branch from main to dev February 13, 2026 13:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants