Add UT on checking temporary checkpoint creation in local filesystem #1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HeartSaVioR
force-pushed
the
SPARK-26825-add-UT
branch
from
fbad47c to
eccf55a
Compare
gaborgsomogyi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 10, 2019
…te temporary path in local staging directory ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Th environment of my cluster as follows: ``` OS:Linux version 2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64 (mockbuildc6b18n3.bsys.dev.centos.org) (gcc version 4.4.6 20110731 (Red Hat 4.4.6-3) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 00:52:02 GMT 2012 Hadoop: 2.7.2 Spark: 2.3.0 or 3.0.0(master branch) Hive: 1.2.1 ``` My spark run on deploy mode yarn-client. If I execute the SQL `insert overwrite local directory '/home/test/call_center/' select * from call_center`, a HiveException will appear as follows: `Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.metadata.HiveException: java.io.IOException: Mkdirs failed to create file:/home/xitong/hive/stagingdir_hive_2019-02-19_17-31-00_678_1816816774691551856-1/-ext-10000/_temporary/0/_temporary/attempt_20190219173233_0002_m_000000_3 (exists=false, cwd=file:/data10/yarn/nm-local-dir/usercache/xitong/appcache/application_1543893582405_6126857/container_e124_1543893582405_6126857_01_000011) at org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.HiveFileFormatUtils.getHiveRecordWriter(HiveFileFormatUtils.java:249)` Current spark sql generate a local temporary path in local staging directory.The schema of local temporary path start with `file`, so the HiveException appears. This PR change the local temporary path to HDFS temporary path, and use DistributedFileSystem instance copy the data from HDFS temporary path to local directory. If Spark run on local deploy mode, 'insert overwrite local directory' works fine. ## How was this patch tested? UT cannot support yarn-client mode.The test is in my product environment. Closes apache#23841 from beliefer/fix-bug-of-insert-overwrite-local-dir. Authored-by: gengjiaan <gengjiaan@360.cn> Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
gaborgsomogyi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2019
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR supports `OpenJ9` in addition to `IBM JDK` and `OpenJDK` in Spark by handling `System.getProperty("java.vendor") = "Eclipse OpenJ9"`.
In `inferDefaultMemory()` and `getKrb5LoginModuleName()`, this PR uses non `IBM` way.
```
$ ~/jdk-11.0.2+9_openj9-0.12.1/bin/jshell
| Welcome to JShell -- Version 11.0.2
| For an introduction type: /help intro
jshell> System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.vendor"))
Eclipse OpenJ9
jshell> System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.vm.info"))
JRE 11 Linux amd64-64-Bit Compressed References 20190204_127 (JIT enabled, AOT enabled)
OpenJ9 - 90dd8cb40
OMR - d2f4534b
JCL - 289c70b6844 based on jdk-11.0.2+9
jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.ibm.lang.management.OperatingSystemMXBean").getDeclaredMethod("getTotalPhysicalMemory"))
public abstract long com.ibm.lang.management.OperatingSystemMXBean.getTotalPhysicalMemory()
jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean").getDeclaredMethod("getTotalPhysicalMemorySize"))
public abstract long com.sun.management.OperatingSystemMXBean.getTotalPhysicalMemorySize()
jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.ibm.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule"))
| Exception java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: com.ibm.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule
| at Class.forNameImpl (Native Method)
| at Class.forName (Class.java:339)
| at (#1:1)
jshell> System.out.println(Class.forName("com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule"))
class com.sun.security.auth.module.Krb5LoginModule
```
## How was this patch tested?
Existing test suites
Manual testing with OpenJ9.
Closes apache#24308 from kiszk/SPARK-27397.
Authored-by: Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
gaborgsomogyi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2019
…comparison assertions ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR removes a few hardware-dependent assertions which can cause a failure in `aarch64`. **x86_64** ``` rootdonotdel-openlab-allinone-l00242678:/home/ubuntu# uname -a Linux donotdel-openlab-allinone-l00242678 4.4.0-154-generic apache#181-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 25 05:29:03 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux scala> import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits scala> floatToRawIntBits(0.0f/0.0f) res0: Int = -4194304 scala> floatToRawIntBits(Float.NaN) res1: Int = 2143289344 ``` **aarch64** ``` [rootarm-huangtianhua spark]# uname -a Linux arm-huangtianhua 4.14.0-49.el7a.aarch64 #1 SMP Tue Apr 10 17:22:26 UTC 2018 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux scala> import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits import java.lang.Float.floatToRawIntBits scala> floatToRawIntBits(0.0f/0.0f) res1: Int = 2143289344 scala> floatToRawIntBits(Float.NaN) res2: Int = 2143289344 ``` ## How was this patch tested? Pass the Jenkins (This removes the test coverage). Closes apache#25186 from huangtianhua/special-test-case-for-aarch64. Authored-by: huangtianhua <huangtianhua@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
gaborgsomogyi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2019
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? `org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaDelegationTokenSuite` failed lately. After had a look at the logs it just shows the following fact without any details: ``` Caused by: sbt.ForkMain$ForkError: sun.security.krb5.KrbException: Server not found in Kerberos database (7) - Server not found in Kerberos database ``` Since the issue is intermittent and not able to reproduce it we should add more debug information and wait for reproduction with the extended logs. ### Why are the changes needed? Failing test doesn't give enough debug information. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No. ### How was this patch tested? I've started the test manually and checked that such additional debug messages show up: ``` >>> KrbApReq: APOptions are 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 >>> EType: sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.Aes128CtsHmacSha1EType Looking for keys for: kafka/localhostEXAMPLE.COM Added key: 17version: 0 Added key: 23version: 0 Added key: 16version: 0 Found unsupported keytype (3) for kafka/localhostEXAMPLE.COM >>> EType: sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.Aes128CtsHmacSha1EType Using builtin default etypes for permitted_enctypes default etypes for permitted_enctypes: 17 16 23. >>> EType: sun.security.krb5.internal.crypto.Aes128CtsHmacSha1EType MemoryCache: add 1571936500/174770/16C565221B70AAB2BEFE31A83D13A2F4/client/localhostEXAMPLE.COM to client/localhostEXAMPLE.COM|kafka/localhostEXAMPLE.COM MemoryCache: Existing AuthList: apache#3: 1571936493/200803/8CD70D280B0862C5DA1FF901ECAD39FE/client/localhostEXAMPLE.COM #2: 1571936499/985009/BAD33290D079DD4E3579A8686EC326B7/client/localhostEXAMPLE.COM #1: 1571936499/995208/B76B9D78A9BE283AC78340157107FD40/client/localhostEXAMPLE.COM ``` Closes apache#26252 from gaborgsomogyi/SPARK-29580. Authored-by: Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somogyi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
gaborgsomogyi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Currently the join operators are not well abstracted, since there are lot of common logic. A trait can be created for easier pattern matching and other future handiness. This is a follow-up PR based on comment apache#27509 (comment) . This PR refined from the following aspects: 1. Refined structure of all physical join operators 2. Add missing joinType field for CartesianProductExec operator 3. Refined codes related to Explain Formatted The EXPLAIN FORMATTED changes are 1. Converge all join operator `verboseStringWithOperatorId` implementations to `BaseJoinExec`. Join condition displayed, and join keys displayed if it’s not empty. 2. `#1` will add Join condition to `BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec`. 3. `#1` will **NOT** affect `CartesianProductExec`,`SortMergeJoin` and `HashJoin`s, since they already got there override implementation before. 4. Converge all join operator `simpleStringWithNodeId` to `BaseJoinExec`, which will enhance the one line description for `CartesianProductExec` with `JoinType` added. 5. Override `simpleStringWithNodeId` in `BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec` to show `BuildSide`, which was only done for `HashJoin`s before. ### Why are the changes needed? Make the code consistent with other operators and for future handiness of join operators. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Existing tests Closes apache#27595 from Eric5553/RefineJoin. Authored-by: Eric Wu <492960551@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
gaborgsomogyi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2021
… correctly ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR proposes: 1. `CREATE OR REPLACE TEMP VIEW USING` should use `TemporaryViewRelation` to store temp views. 2. By doing #1, it fixes the issue where the temp view being replaced is not uncached. ### Why are the changes needed? This is a part of an ongoing work to wrap all the temporary views with `TemporaryViewRelation`: [SPARK-34698](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34698). This also fixes a bug where the temp view being replaced is not uncached. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Yes, the temp view being replaced with `CREATE OR REPLACE TEMP VIEW USING` is correctly uncached if the temp view is cached. ### How was this patch tested? Added new tests. Closes apache#31825 from imback82/create_temp_view_using. Authored-by: Terry Kim <yuminkim@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.