Skip to content

Conversation

@fxamacker
Copy link
Owner

@fxamacker fxamacker commented Apr 3, 2023

We now explicitly specify nullable types starting with PR #75.

  • Remove null as an option for type-value.

  • Specify null as an option for capability-type-value and restricted-type-value.

  • Add valid requirement for unique name in function-type.type-parameters.

Thanks @turbolent for great suggestions during our discussions on Slack and for opening PR 75!

Closes #76

Removed null as an option for type-value because we explicitly specify
nullable types starting with PR 75.

Specified null as an option for capability-type-value and restricted-type-value.

Added valid requirement for unique name in function-type.type-parameters.

Thanks Bastian for suggesting this during our discussions on Slack and PR 75!
@fxamacker fxamacker merged commit f8fb746 into main Apr 4, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@turbolent turbolent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove nullable type-value and explicitly specify individual type-value as nullable

3 participants