Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CWE Top25 and SANS Top25 #925

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 3, 2020
Merged

Conversation

segatomo
Copy link
Contributor

@segatomo segatomo commented Dec 4, 2019

If this Pull Request is work in progress, Add a prefix of “[WIP]” in the title.

What did you implement:

Add 2019 CWE Top25 and CWE/SANS Top25 information to vuls report in addition to OWASP Top 10.
https://www.sans.org/top25-software-errors/
https://cwe.mitre.org/top25/archive/2019/2019_cwe_top25.html

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

vuls scan, reoprt -format-full-text

Checklist:

You don't have to satisfy all of the following.

  • Write tests
  • Write documentation
  • Check that there aren't other open pull requests for the same issue/feature
  • Format your source code by make fmt
  • Pass the test by make test
  • Provide verification config / commands
  • Enable "Allow edits from maintainers" for this PR
  • Update the messages below

Is this ready for review?: YES

Reference

@segatomo segatomo changed the title [WIP]Add CWE Top25 and SANS Top25 Add CWE Top25 and SANS Top25 Mar 3, 2020
@kotakanbe kotakanbe merged commit 5729ad6 into future-architect:master Mar 3, 2020
@kotakanbe
Copy link
Member

@segatomo Many Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants