Skip to content

Provide feedback on CL LLM data models #106

@nadahlberg

Description

@nadahlberg

Spell out three suggestions:

  • Using litellm as provider neutral backend
  • Thinking of system prompt / user message in terms of more general prefix messages
  • Considering patterns for the two main sources of non-serializable workflows: tool calls and agent hooks.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

Status

Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions