Skip to content

Conversation

grandizzy
Copy link
Collaborator

@grandizzy grandizzy commented Aug 27, 2025

Motivation

Solution

  • introduce builder to create ContractsByArtifact from contracts iter and enrich with storage layouts (if available)

PR Checklist

  • Added Tests
  • Added Documentation
  • Breaking changes

Copy link
Contributor

@yash-atreya yash-atreya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

makes sense!

Copy link
Contributor

@0xrusowsky 0xrusowsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

probably a good reason to eventually work on adding coverage to the benchmarks

@grandizzy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lgtm!

probably a good reason to eventually work on adding coverage to the benchmarks

yeah, I think that's more about missing unit test for common coverage case, should be added now

@grandizzy grandizzy merged commit 6e6341b into foundry-rs:master Aug 27, 2025
22 checks passed
@grandizzy grandizzy deleted the issue-11432 branch August 27, 2025 11:46
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in Foundry Aug 27, 2025
MerkleBoy pushed a commit to MerkleBoy/foundry that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Coverage is significantly reduced after upgrade to nightly version

4 participants