Updated correctness proof #17
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@JoaoDiogoDuarte Hi. It would be great to integrate these proofs in the CI of EasyCrypt. https://github.com/EasyCrypt/easycrypt/wiki/External-CI The more projects I have in the CI, the more I can check for regression (the pool of EC proofs in the wild is not that big) |
|
@strub for sure! I will have a look next week |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR provides Easycrypt files that can be run within the CI/CD which prove the correctness of the Formosa-25519 implementation of scalar multiplication using Curve25519. There are some lemmas that are admitted as they have been proven elsewhere in Cryptoline. Adding these proofs to this repository will be future work.
Preexisting proof files are patched and updated to ensure traceability and transparency.
A README.md was written to document the proofs and clarify which lemmas are admitted but proven in Cryptoline.