Skip to content

Ignoring & Selecting Different Frequency Ranges #8

Open
@TomDonoghue

Description

@TomDonoghue

There has been some discussion of either adding exclusion zones to model fitting, and/or fitting different frequency ranges for aperiodic & periodic fitting. This is something that could be broadly interesting, and useful, but I think it needs a bit more looking to figure if and how to best adopt it.

Things to keep in mind:

  • If there are 'gaps' in the fit spectrum, we have to consider if and how to fit peaks that might be next to, or overlap with, these regions.
    • Related: we have procedures for dealing with peaks near edges, that might need to be extended
  • The logic of the model recommends that to fit either periodic or aperiodic requires dealing with / fitting the other component. Though I think there could be reason and utility to fit different ranges / exclude regions, I don't think we want to lean too far into fitting these as separate processes.

Related prior discussions:

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions