Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GPU improved launch parameters, memory usage, etc. #1100

Open
wants to merge 26 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

markusbattarbee
Copy link
Contributor

Differentiates between Ukko DGX (V100 nodes) and A100 nodes. Updates to up-to-date modules. DGX has much better queue times, but performance is still a bit too slow for CI (about 1h 20 mins). A100 nodes suffer, in addition to terrible queue times, from terrible core/thread/GPU placement, awaiting fixes from IT4sci.

GPU initial memory buffers were changed to scale with WID value so WID=8 binaries don't hog up crazy amounts of memory. Also fixed a mis-indexing in GPU memory reporting. Some tests still report more GPU memory use than expected, pending investigation.

Cleans away some broken timers from GPU branch.

Improves readability of batch operation launch parameters (use of std::max)

Improves launch parameters for GPU kernels, especially when not using warp accessors (which is the default).

@markusbattarbee
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now it would be possible to go back to a single ukko CUDA makefile, compiling and linking the binary to support both V100 and A100 cards (architectures 70 and 80) but compilation will take longer, and compiling for an older architecture should be safe. Thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor

@ykempf ykempf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it otherwise works... But apart from this one comment I have not looked in detail.

@ykempf
Copy link
Contributor

ykempf commented Feb 19, 2025

And here too the output file is truncated mid-Ionos

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants