Repository navigation
Optional posture sections in design doc template #51
Description
Activity
🔗 Related PRs
#18 - Land 0030-0033 repo-truth and MCP debt fixes [merged]
#20 - Add backlog notes for agent-first planning and review workflow [merged]
📝 Issue Planner
Check the box below or use the
@coderabbitai plancommand to generate an implementation plan and prompts that you can use with your favorite coding assistant.- Create Plan
🧪 Issue enrichment is currently in open beta.
You can configure auto-planning by selecting labels in the issue_enrichment configuration.
To disable automatic issue enrichment, add the following to your
.coderabbit.yaml:issue_enrichment: auto_enrich: enabled: false
💬 Have feedback or questions? Drop into our discord!
Migrated from Method backlog
This issue was created from a legacy filesystem backlog card. GitHub Issues are now the live work tracker; repository docs remain Method evidence.
Source backlog:
docs/method/backlog/cool-ideas/PROCESS_optional-posture-sections-in-design-doc-template.mdOriginal lane:
cool-ideasOriginal legend:
PROCESSOriginal backlog card
Optional posture sections in design doc template
The design doc template requires accessibility, localization, and agent inspectability posture sections even for trivial changes where the answer is always 'not in scope.' These should be required for L-sized cycles and available-but-not-mandatory for M-sized ones. The pull scaffold should ask or infer the cycle size and emit the appropriate template.