You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
The observation basis is pinned to content but not to path #29
PR #27's anti-constant guard varies the bytes on a fixed path:
complete_success_case stale-basis-actual 81 'changed after request' stale.txt 65536
complete_success_case stale-basis-other 82 'a wholly different content' stale.txt 65536
test"$stale_other_basis"!= "$stale_actual_basis"
bounded_workspace_observation_basis_v1 takes (path, bytes) pairs. Nothing in the observation witness varies the path while holding the bytes constant. A regression that dropped the path from the derivation — hashing only content — would leave the entire suite green.
Why it matters
The witness claims the basis describes what was read. "What was read" is a (path, bytes) pair, not a byte string. Half the input is unpinned.
The patch witness is not obviously better here, so this may be a shared gap rather than an observation-specific one; that is worth checking before fixing only one side.
Scope note
This was identified while writing #27 and deliberately not added there. The PR's claim was already scoped to "varies with the observed bytes on a fixed path", so there was no gap between claim and evidence to repair — only a strengthening available. Filing it as the strengthening it is.
Acceptance
A successful observation of identical bytes at a different path derives a different basis.
The same check exists for the patch witness, or an explicit note records why it does not apply there.
#24 - Prove basis-bound validated patch application [merged] #27 - Bind observation settlements to their basis evidence [open]
📝 Issue Planner
Check the box below or use the @coderabbitai plan command to generate an implementation plan and prompts that you can use with your favorite coding assistant.
Create Plan
🧪 Issue enrichment is currently in open beta.
You can configure auto-planning by selecting labels in the issue_enrichment configuration.
To disable automatic issue enrichment, add the following to your .coderabbit.yaml:
issue_enrichment:
auto_enrich:
enabled: false
💬 Have feedback or questions? Drop into our discord!
Activity
coderabbitai commentedon Aug 4, 2026
🔗 Related PRs
#24 - Prove basis-bound validated patch application [merged]
#27 - Bind observation settlements to their basis evidence [open]
📝 Issue Planner
Check the box below or use the
@coderabbitai plancommand to generate an implementation plan and prompts that you can use with your favorite coding assistant.🧪 Issue enrichment is currently in open beta.
You can configure auto-planning by selecting labels in the issue_enrichment configuration.
To disable automatic issue enrichment, add the following to your
.coderabbit.yaml:💬 Have feedback or questions? Drop into our discord!