docs: record git-warp gate ownership

[flyingrobots]

Summary

• record git-stunts/git-warp as the git-warp implementation owner for the Continuum stack suffix-exchange gate
• add the git-warp implementation issue to the live hierarchy in design packet 0035
• update the changelog for the coordination correction

GitHub Coordination

• created git-stunts/git-warp#663 for the git-warp implementation gate
• linked git-stunts/git-warp#663 under flyingrobots/continuum#33
• wired native dependencies between continuum#33, echo#591, and git-warp#663
• added git-warp#663 to Project docs: document CodeRabbit unblock comment #15 with Track: Suffix Exchange, Goalpost: GP3, Target: 1.0, Risk: Critical, Proof: Missing, Slice: Needs decomposition

Validation

• git diff --check
• npx markdownlint-cli2 CHANGELOG.md docs/design/0035-continuum-stack-convergence/README.md
• LC_ALL=C rg -n '[^[:ascii:]]' CHANGELOG.md docs/design/0035-continuum-stack-convergence/README.md returned no matches

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7783a838-8d7f-418b-982c-afeb2c74e361

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce7bb41 and aad6fe1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• CHANGELOG.md
• docs/design/0035-continuum-stack-convergence/README.md

📜 Recent review details

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

**: # AGENTS.md

Role

Continuum is the coordination spine for the active stack. It does not own a
runtime implementation, a substrate, or a parallel ontology. It owns shared
truth across Echo, git-warp, warp-ttd, and Wesley.

Git Safety

• Never amend commits.
• Never rebase.
• Never force git operations.
• Stage only the files written in the current turn.
• Commit each completed slice in the same turn.

Process

• Read METHOD.md before changing structure.
• Keep active work in docs/design/.
• Keep concrete work in docs/method/backlog/.
• Keep retros in docs/method/retro/.
• Update docs/BEARING.md and docs/VISION.md
  only at cycle boundaries.

Doctrine

• Continuum owns coordination truth, not substrate truth.
• Shared nouns need one authored home and explicit publication boundaries.
• Cross-repo witness and compatibility truth beats hand-wavy alignment claims.
• No shadow schemas, no shadow vocabularies, no shadow ownership.

Files:

• CHANGELOG.md
• docs/design/0035-continuum-stack-convergence/README.md

🔇 Additional comments (4)

docs/design/0035-continuum-stack-convergence/README.md (2)

58-58: LGTM!

---

262-267: Gate D issue split verified—scoping is architecturally sound.

Verification confirms the two-issue separation is clean and properly scoped:

• Issue flyingrobots/continuum#33 owns only the suffix-exchange profile and release coordination role. Body explicitly identifies it as the canonical profile/coordination repository.
• Issue git-stunts/git-warp#663 owns the implementation proof. Body correctly positions it as the git-warp implementation owner that implements Continuum's profile.

Cross-repo issue coupling is correct. Gate D completion requires witnessed proof from the git-warp side, which properly binds the shared profile to its runtime implementation.

CHANGELOG.md (2)

5-6: LGTM!

---

1-45: The PR correctly adds the Continuum Stack Convergence coordination packet; Project #15 structure and metadata schema are properly documented in design 0035.

The original review incorrectly flagged Project #15 metadata and "native dependencies wiring" as missing or not visible. The design document docs/design/0035-continuum-stack-convergence/README.md explicitly defines:

• Project #15 scope and purpose
• Custom metadata field schema with all enumerated values (Track, Goalpost, Target, Risk, Proof, Slice)
• Initial GitHub project reference and hierarchy
• Gate D issue references linking Continuum (#33) and git-stunts/git-warp (#663)

The CHANGELOG.md correctly documents the convergence packet addition; it is not the appropriate place to detail individual Project items—that belongs in the design documentation (present) and on the GitHub Project board itself.

The "native dependencies wiring" claim lacks grounding in the submission. The design doc discusses native operation proof and native execution semantics, not dependency wiring as a discrete deliverable. If this is a PR objective, it should be a separate explicit change or documented as a follow-on work.

			> Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

---

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated project documentation to clarify ownership and implementation responsibilities.
  • Enhanced coordination details for the Continuum Stack Convergence initiative and release planning.

Walkthrough

Two documentation files are updated to formally record git-stunts/git-warp as the owner of the Continuum stack suffix-exchange gate. The design doc's ownership table and Gate D release bar section are revised to split responsibilities between Continuum and git-warp, and a changelog entry is added.

Changes

git-warp Ownership Documentation

Layer / File(s)

Summary

Ownership table, Gate D split, and changelog docs/design/0035-continuum-stack-convergence/README.md, CHANGELOG.md

Decision section ownership table explicitly assigns causal suffix substrate and peer-exchange implementation to git-warp. Gate D release bar gains a second bullet pointing to git-stunts/git-warp; the explanatory paragraph is rewritten to separate Continuum (shared profile/release coordination) from git-warp (peer implementation). The stale "lives in Continuum until repo is identified" sentence is removed. Changelog records git-stunts/git-warp as the gate's implementation owner.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

📜 Two docs, a table, a bullet, a gate—
The warp repo's name now sealed by fate.
Gate D split in two, ownership clear,
The old "TBD" text... banished from here.
Pedantry demands: every word earn its place.
✅ These did. Proceed, at a dignified pace.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely summarizes the primary change: recording git-warp gate ownership in documentation.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is directly related to the changeset, providing detailed summary, GitHub coordination details, and validation steps performed.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}