Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

quickstart: update flux module and flux job list usage #14

Closed
SteVwonder opened this issue Jan 16, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

quickstart: update flux module and flux job list usage #14

SteVwonder opened this issue Jan 16, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@SteVwonder
Copy link
Member

After the most recent release (i.e., in current master), the flux module command lost the --rank argument, and the flux job list command moved from being a "porcelain" command to being a "plumbing" command. It has been replaced by "flux jobs".

The quickstart.rst should be updated to reflect these changes.

cmoussa1 added a commit to cmoussa1/flux-docs that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2020
Update the module listing, job listing commands to reflect the changes in flux-framework/flux-core

Addresses issue flux-framework#14
cmoussa1 added a commit to cmoussa1/flux-docs that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2020
Update the module listing, job listing commands to reflect the changes in flux-framework/flux-core

Addresses issue flux-framework#14
cmoussa1 added a commit to cmoussa1/flux-docs that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2020
Update the module listing, job listing commands to reflect the changes in flux-framework/flux-core

Addresses issue flux-framework#14
@cmoussa1
Copy link
Member

This issue should be fixed by PR #20, so I'll go ahead and close this.

@grondo
Copy link
Contributor

grondo commented Feb 28, 2020

Note that flux job list default output changed again 😂

The output can perhaps be updated once we generalize and unify usernames in all examples in the docs.

@cmoussa1
Copy link
Member

Oops! Thanks for clarifying @grondo 🤣 maybe I should re-open this for now? Do you think those changes could be made in @SteVwonder's current PR?

@grondo
Copy link
Contributor

grondo commented Feb 28, 2020

Might as well do it in the fix for #26

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants