This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 25, 2025. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just curious: why are there two
TRACE_EVENT_ASYNC_END0("flutter", "PipelineItem", trace_id)
(one here ,one in~ProducerContinuation()
), but only oneTRACE_EVENT_ASYNC_BEGIN0("flutter", "PipelineItem", trace_id_)
in theProducerContinuation
constructor? Could it be possible that BEGIN is called once while END is called twice? Maybe it's Ok to call END multiple times?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A trace can end only once. The end call in the destructor is if the pipeline drops the continuation (while shutting down the engine maybe). See the
if (continuation_)
.