Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@jonahwilliams
Copy link
Contributor

Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.

List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue.

If you had to change anything in the flutter/tests repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the breaking change policy.

Pre-launch Checklist

  • I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
  • I read the Tree Hygiene wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
  • I read and followed the Flutter Style Guide and the C++, Objective-C, Java style guides.
  • I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
  • I added new tests to check the change I am making or feature I am adding, or the PR is test-exempt. See testing the engine for instructions on writing and running engine tests.
  • I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
  • I signed the CLA.
  • All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.

auto-submit bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Use a faster method to compute the number of subdivisions of quadradic and cubic curves. Unlike the adaptive subdivison we use this may give us more line segments around straight-ish parts of a curve ... but who cares! the rasterizer can handle it. This is enough to lop off about 2ms from the animated tessellation benchmark (5.5 to 3.5 on a Pixel 7), and there are some additional savings we can book by removing some of the incidental allocations. This part will be done in a follow up (#52078).

### Before

![image](https://github.com/flutter/engine/assets/8975114/8dc45012-3999-4598-ac3b-713e09d5a31f)

### After

![image](https://github.com/flutter/engine/assets/8975114/8a90636f-9698-46e6-bd3f-2f47c8abdbba)

From looking at the proproptions I think this is in the 3x-5x faster range.

Code originally taken from https://github.com/google/skia/blob/main/src/gpu/tessellate/WangsFormula.h
@jonahwilliams
Copy link
Contributor Author

Following up here: #52131

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant