Skip to content

Conversation

@Syspretor
Copy link
Collaborator

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

fixes #XXXX

Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

data:
runtime.json: |
{{ .Values.runtimeValue }}
{{- end -}}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add return of line.

@Syspretor Syspretor force-pushed the enhancement/improve-controller-performance branch 3 times, most recently from afa7389 to 27dc8e9 Compare April 29, 2025 12:50
@fluid-e2e-bot
Copy link

fluid-e2e-bot bot commented Apr 29, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign zwwhdls for approval by writing /assign @zwwhdls in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Syspretor Syspretor force-pushed the enhancement/improve-controller-performance branch from 27dc8e9 to 56c79d0 Compare April 30, 2025 02:40
Signed-off-by: 玖宇 <guotongyu.gty@alibaba-inc.com>
@Syspretor Syspretor force-pushed the enhancement/improve-controller-performance branch from 56c79d0 to 0cec2f1 Compare April 30, 2025 03:50
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants