What feature you'd like to add:
see #5836 (comment)
Consider adding: (1) a validation in the ThinRuntime webhook or controller that rejects CacheRuntime as physicalRuntimeType, or (2) documentation that explicitly lists supported runtime types for ThinRuntime reference.
Why is this feature needed:
there is no user-facing documentation or validation to prevent users from attempting this configuration. Without a webhook validation or clear docs, users may configure a ThinRuntime pointing to a CacheRuntime-backed Dataset and get a cryptic runtime error.
What feature you'd like to add:
see #5836 (comment)
Consider adding: (1) a validation in the ThinRuntime webhook or controller that rejects CacheRuntime as physicalRuntimeType, or (2) documentation that explicitly lists supported runtime types for ThinRuntime reference.
Why is this feature needed:
there is no user-facing documentation or validation to prevent users from attempting this configuration. Without a webhook validation or clear docs, users may configure a ThinRuntime pointing to a CacheRuntime-backed Dataset and get a cryptic runtime error.