Poor support for 'ActionResult<T>' type?

[julealgon]

Just started using the library and quickly realized that there is only a single assertion for IActionResult<T>, BeConvertibleTo<T>.

This method doesn't help much when dealing with default responses and values, since you still have to explicitly say what the values and types are. For instance, this seems a bit unintuitive to me:

result.Should().BeConvertibleTo<ObjectResult>().Which.Value.Should().Be(myValue)

I noticed that there are quite a few checks on IActionResult. Shoudn't most of those be ported to work with ActionResult<T> as well?

[faddiv]

Hi @julealgon,
When I initially created the IActionResult<T> implementation I was unsure where it should head so I leaved for a while. What I realized that time It is based on ObjectResult but there was no assertion for that so I worked on that in the past months. Next I can go back to this issue.
Any suggestion and help on this topic is a welcome.
By the way it will take a while until it is finished because other things.

[faddiv]

I added some support for the scenario. Now you can do things like this:

result.Should().BeObjectResult()
                .WithValue(model)