Skip to content

Conversation

@flow-tech
Copy link
Contributor

@flow-tech flow-tech commented Oct 6, 2025

About this PR

Updates:

Usage

Please merge!

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

⚙ Adjust future updates

Add these to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of these dependencies:

updates.ignore = [
  { groupId = "org.scala-sbt", artifactId = "sbt" }
]

Or, add these to slow down future updates of these dependencies:

dependencyOverrides = [
  {
    pullRequests = { frequency = "30 days" },
    dependency = { groupId = "org.scala-sbt", artifactId = "sbt" }
  }
]
labels: scala-steward

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated build tooling to the latest patch version to align with upstream improvements.
    • Enhances overall build stability and compatibility with recent dependencies.
    • No changes to user-facing behavior or functionality.
    • Low-risk maintenance update aimed at ensuring consistent development and release processes.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 6, 2025 03:00
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the SBT build tool version from 1.11.6 to 1.11.7 as part of routine third-party dependency maintenance.

  • Updates SBT version to the latest patch release 1.11.7

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 6, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated the SBT build version in project/build.properties from 1.11.6 to 1.11.7. No source code or control-flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
Build tooling
project/build.properties
Updated sbt.version from 1.11.6 to 1.11.7.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • gheine
  • github-actions

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title “Third party dependency updates” is related to the change but remains overly broad and does not specify which dependency or version is being updated. It uses generic phrasing that fails to highlight the primary change of bumping sbt from 1.11.6 to 1.11.7 in project/build.properties. As a result, a teammate scanning the project history would not immediately understand the specific update being made. Please revise the title to clearly describe the main change, for example “Update sbt version to 1.11.7,” so that the specific dependency update is immediately obvious.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 41d5779 and 0aefc7d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • project/build.properties (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Jenkins
🔇 Additional comments (1)
project/build.properties (1)

1-1: LGTM on the sbt bump.

Nothing else changed; this upgrade looks good to ship.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@flow-tech
Copy link
Contributor Author

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit c1f0135 into main Oct 6, 2025
10 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the update/third-party branch October 6, 2025 10:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants