Added marshal_with_field decorator, see issue #212 #214
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@lyschoening I like it. Thanks for contributing! |
dougblack
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2014
Added marshal_with_field decorator, see issue #212
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've added a new decorator for marshalling with a single field as requested in #212. Use cases are methods that return either a list or a single item.
I went with
marshal_with_fieldas the name for the decorator; another name might be more suitable.I've also edited the internals of the
Listfield so that the formatting actually happens in theformat()function rather than only inoutput().