Skip to content

Conversation

@wvl94
Copy link
Contributor

@wvl94 wvl94 commented Nov 13, 2024

💡 PR Summary generated by FirstMate

Overview: Added Docker support and a new API route for enhanced functionality.

Changes:
Dockerfile:

  • Created a Dockerfile to containerize the application using Node.js 19-alpine.
  • Set environment variable for PORT and configured user permissions.

API Route Update:

  • Added a new GET route /get/:id in exampleRouter.js for fetching data by ID.

Configuration Change:

  • Updated appConfig.js to default server port to 80 instead of 8080.

TLDR: Introduced Docker support and a new API route for data retrieval; updated server port configuration. Focus on the Dockerfile and new route in exampleRouter.js.

Generated by FirstMate and automatically updated on every commit.

@firstmate
Copy link

firstmate bot commented Nov 13, 2024

PR Review

⚠️ It seems that you can still improve the quality of your PR:

    ❌ Documentation drift: Inconsistent port settings between Dockerfile (8080) and appConfig.js (80) needs updating.
    ❌ Security issues: Missing grantAccessByPermissionMiddleware on '/get/:id' route for permission checks.
    ❌ Docker best practices: Use multi-stage builds in Dockerfile for optimized image size and build efficiency.

Generated by Firstmate to make sure you can focus on coding new features.

Comment on lines +2 to +12
ENV PORT 8080

WORKDIR /usr/src/app

RUN addgroup -S appgroup && adduser -S appuser -G appgroup
USER appuser

RUN apk add --no-cache git
COPY . .
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["npm", "start", "--no-update-notifier"] No newline at end of file
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

alt text

You changed the application to run on port 8080 in the Dockerfile, while the default server port in appConfig.js has been changed to 80. This inconsistency should be addressed in the documentation to ensure users know which port to use when starting the application. Consider updating the documentation to clarify the expected port settings. For example:

## Running the Application

To start the application, use the following command:

```bash
docker run -p 8080:8080 your-image-name

By default, the application will run on port 80 unless specified otherwise.

Comment on lines +12 to +13
router.route("/get/:id").get(exampleController.getById)

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

alt text

The route '/get/:id' is missing the grantAccessByPermissionMiddleware, which is essential for proper permission checks. Update the route definition to include this middleware as follows:

+ router.route("/get/:id").get(grantAccessByPermissionMiddleware([API_PERMISSIONS.PUBLIC_ENDPOINT]), exampleController.getById)

This ensures that access permissions are validated before executing the controller logic.

(Based on guideline 'Routes should check permissions')

Comment on lines +1 to +12
FROM node:19-alpine
ENV PORT 8080

WORKDIR /usr/src/app

RUN addgroup -S appgroup && adduser -S appuser -G appgroup
USER appuser

RUN apk add --no-cache git
COPY . .
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["npm", "start", "--no-update-notifier"] No newline at end of file
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

alt text

Consider using multi-stage builds in your Dockerfile to optimize the image size and build efficiency by separating the build environment from the runtime environment. Here's a simplified example based on your current Dockerfile:

FROM node:19-alpine AS build
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm install
COPY . .

FROM node:19-alpine
WORKDIR /usr/src/app
COPY --from=build /usr/src/app ./
EXPOSE 8080
CMD ["npm", "start", "--no-update-notifier"]

(Based on guideline 'Dockerfiles should use multi-stage builds')

@wvl94 wvl94 closed this Nov 13, 2024
@firstmate
Copy link

firstmate bot commented Nov 13, 2024

alt text

I analysed the failed pipeline job Validate docker:

Failure Analysis

The pipeline crashed during the Docker build step, specifically when executing the command to install git using apk. The error message indicates a permission issue:

ERROR: Unable to lock database: Permission denied
ERROR: Failed to open apk database: Permission denied

This suggests that the RUN apk add --no-cache git command is being executed as a non-root user (appuser), which does not have the necessary permissions to install packages. This issue likely existed before the current PR changes, as the PR does not modify the Dockerfile or any related build configurations.

Suggested Fix

To resolve the permission issue, you can modify the Dockerfile to switch to the root user before running the apk add command. Here’s a small change to implement:

- USER appuser
+ USER root
RUN apk add --no-cache git
+ USER appuser

This change allows the installation of git with the necessary permissions and then switches back to the appuser for subsequent commands. Ensure that the Dockerfile is structured to maintain security best practices by minimizing the time spent as the root user.

@firstmate
Copy link

firstmate bot commented Nov 13, 2024

alt text

I analysed the failed pipeline job Validate docker:

Failure Analysis

The pipeline crashed during the Docker build step, specifically when trying to install git using the command apk add --no-cache git. The logs indicate a permission issue:

ERROR: Unable to lock database: Permission denied
ERROR: Failed to open apk database: Permission denied

This error suggests that the Dockerfile is attempting to run the apk command as a non-root user (appuser), which does not have the necessary permissions to modify the package database. This issue likely existed before the current PR, as the changes in the PR do not affect the Dockerfile or the build process directly.

Suggested Fix

To resolve the permission issue, you can modify the Dockerfile to switch to the root user before running the apk command, and then switch back to the appuser. Here’s how you can adjust the Dockerfile:

- USER appuser
+ USER root
RUN apk add --no-cache git
+ USER appuser

This change allows the apk command to execute with the necessary permissions to install packages. After making this adjustment, the pipeline should be able to complete the Docker build step successfully.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants