Skip to content

[1.11] chore(metric): add per-test metric dimension for coarse grained metrics #5254

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

roypat
Copy link
Contributor

@roypat roypat commented Jun 6, 2025

The current metric dimensions are so that we have 13k+ different sets of dimensions for each metric, which makes it impossible to plot in CloudWatch.
This change adds a new set of dimensions with just the test name so that we reduce it to a few hundreds and are able to plot them (CW limit is 500).

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • I have read and understand CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkstyle to verify that the PR passes the
    automated style checks.
  • I have described what is done in these changes, why they are needed, and
    how they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
  • I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)
    in the PR.
  • I have mentioned all user-facing changes in CHANGELOG.md.
  • If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • When making API changes, I have followed the
    Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/or
    integration tests.
  • I have linked an issue to every new TODO.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

The current metric dimensions are so that we have 13k+ different sets of
dimensions for each metric, which makes it impossible to plot in
CloudWatch.
This change adds a new set of dimensions with just the test name so that
we reduce it to a few hundreds and are able to plot them (CW limit is
500).

Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <mancio@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Roy <roypat@amazon.co.uk>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.19%. Comparing base (b5ee7be) to head (df8adc4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on firecracker-v1.11.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           firecracker-v1.11    #5254   +/-   ##
==================================================
  Coverage              83.19%   83.19%           
==================================================
  Files                    247      247           
  Lines                  26636    26636           
==================================================
  Hits                   22160    22160           
  Misses                  4476     4476           
Flag Coverage Δ
5.10-c5n.metal 83.67% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m5n.metal 83.65% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6a.metal 82.86% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6g.metal 79.67% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6i.metal 83.64% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
5.10-m7a.metal-48xl 82.86% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m7g.metal 79.67% <ø> (ø)
6.1-c5n.metal 83.66% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
6.1-m5n.metal 83.66% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6a.metal 82.86% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6g.metal 79.67% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6i.metal 83.64% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
6.1-m7a.metal-48xl 82.86% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m7g.metal 79.66% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@roypat roypat added the Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed label Jun 6, 2025
@bchalios bchalios merged commit cb23703 into firecracker-microvm:firecracker-v1.11 Jun 9, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants