Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NI-PoRep #1559

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024
Merged

NI-PoRep #1559

merged 8 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

rvagg
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Jun 25, 2024

This PR contains all of #1537 squashed into a single commit (sorry to lose all your excellent progress @NemanjaLu92 but it was getting a bit noisy!), rebased on master so we get #1553, and with additional fixes to address the remaining items listed in the review @ #1537.

My additional changes are the commits on top of the base commit here. Currently this is the diff I'm responsible for here compare to review comments in #1537): 730d6c7...929373a

@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Jun 25, 2024

Also pushed in a single commit form of #1543 which just adds tests that match filecoin-project/go-state-types#270 (which is merged)

Copy link
Contributor

@ZenGround0 ZenGround0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The diff LGTM assuming the original NI Porep PR has passed review.

actors/miner/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rvagg rvagg force-pushed the rvagg/niporep branch 2 times, most recently from 5d61fe1 to 6a83b82 Compare June 25, 2024 05:06
@aarshkshah1992
Copy link
Contributor

Approving since all review comments in base PR have been addressed and the diff on top of that has also been reviewed.

@aarshkshah1992 aarshkshah1992 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 86fd57c Jun 25, 2024
14 checks passed
@aarshkshah1992 aarshkshah1992 deleted the rvagg/niporep branch June 25, 2024 08:24
aarshkshah1992 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
* feat(miner): ProveCommitSectorsNI and tests

* chore(niporep): fix parameter naming

* chore(niporep): improve test function name

* chore(niporep): check return values from method

* fix(niporep): hard-fail on future sector seal randomness

* fix(niporep): properly test aggregate fee payment at boundary

* test(miner): add niporep params cbor forms vector tests

* chore(miner): extract NI_AGGREGATE_FEE_BASE_SECTOR_COUNT constant

---------

Co-authored-by: Nemanja <7816150+NemanjaLu92@users.noreply.github.com>
aarshkshah1992 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
* feat(miner): ProveCommitSectorsNI and tests

* chore(niporep): fix parameter naming

* chore(niporep): improve test function name

* chore(niporep): check return values from method

* fix(niporep): hard-fail on future sector seal randomness

* fix(niporep): properly test aggregate fee payment at boundary

* test(miner): add niporep params cbor forms vector tests

* chore(miner): extract NI_AGGREGATE_FEE_BASE_SECTOR_COUNT constant

---------

Co-authored-by: Nemanja <7816150+NemanjaLu92@users.noreply.github.com>
aarshkshah1992 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2024
* NI-PoRep (#1559)

* feat(miner): ProveCommitSectorsNI and tests

* chore(niporep): fix parameter naming

* chore(niporep): improve test function name

* chore(niporep): check return values from method

* fix(niporep): hard-fail on future sector seal randomness

* fix(niporep): properly test aggregate fee payment at boundary

* test(miner): add niporep params cbor forms vector tests

* chore(miner): extract NI_AGGREGATE_FEE_BASE_SECTOR_COUNT constant

---------

Co-authored-by: Nemanja <7816150+NemanjaLu92@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update actors version for v14.0 release (#1561)

update actors version

---------

Co-authored-by: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Co-authored-by: Nemanja <7816150+NemanjaLu92@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants