chore: List of avaliable online and offline stores exposed in test configuration

[pyalex]

Signed-off-by: pyalex moskalenko.alexey@gmail.com

What this PR does / why we need it:

This will allow generating custom repo configs in specific test modules based on available online and offline stores.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2625 (b0e8d90) into master (5200fde) will decrease coverage by 0.29%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2625      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.66%   81.37%   -0.30%     
==========================================
  Files         161      161              
  Lines       13307    13314       +7     
==========================================
- Hits        10867    10834      -33     
- Misses       2440     2480      +40     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	71.84% <100.00%> (-1.08%)	⬇️
unittests	59.81% <100.00%> (+0.42%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ts/integration/feature_repos/repo_configuration.py	89.44% <100.00%> (+0.30%)	⬆️
sdk/python/feast/infra/online_stores/datastore.py	50.23% <0.00%> (-40.47%)	⬇️
sdk/python/tests/utils/online_read_write_test.py	93.54% <0.00%> (-6.46%)	⬇️
.../integration/online_store/test_online_retrieval.py	96.84% <0.00%> (-3.16%)	⬇️
...python/tests/integration/e2e/test_universal_e2e.py	86.53% <0.00%> (-1.47%)	⬇️
...ython/feast/embedded_go/online_features_service.py	95.04% <0.00%> (-1.00%)	⬇️
...thon/feast/infra/offline_stores/bigquery_source.py	85.71% <0.00%> (-0.90%)	⬇️
.../online_stores/contrib/hbase_online_store/hbase.py	34.69% <0.00%> (+29.59%)	⬆️
sdk/python/feast/infra/utils/hbase_utils.py	41.17% <0.00%> (+38.23%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5200fde...b0e8d90. Read the comment docs.

[felixwang9817]

I'm a bit confused by what this PR accomplishes - how does it make it easier to specify a set of configs for a test?

[pyalex]

@felixwang9817
so usage could be like this

# test_logged_features.py

from tests.integration.feature_repos import AVAILABLE_OFFLINE_STORES

LOCAL_REPO_CONFIGS = [
   IntegrationTestRepoConfig(
        provider="gcp",
        offline_store_creator=BigQueryDataSourceCreator,
        online_store=REDIS_CONFIG,
        go_feature_retrieval=True,
    ),
   IntegrationTestRepoConfig(
        provider="aws",
        offline_store_creator=RedshiftDataSourceCreator,
        online_store=REDIS_CONFIG,
        go_feature_retrieval=True,
    ),

]

@pytest.fixture(params=[
    c for c in LOCAL_REPO_CONFIGS if c.offline_store_creator in AVAILABLE_OFFLINE_STORES and c.online_store...
])
def local_environment():
     ...


def test_go_features_logging(local_environment):
    ...

[felixwang9817]

@pyalex got it, I think this is fine for now so I'll stamp. In the long run it still feels quite awkward to set up a LOCAL_REPO_CONFIGS in each test file (let alone per test); I like the decorators approach more.

[felixwang9817]

/lgtm

[feast-ci-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: felixwang9817, pyalex

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [felixwang9817]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment