Memory store repartitioning behavior #199
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note: Before submitting this pull request, please review our contributing
guidelines.
Description
I use memory store on production for aggregation tables. So, if we are use 2 partitions on table's changelog topic, we want table keys to be partitioned accross workers. But, in memory store we will have old keys, that, after repartition (rebalance), belongs to new worker. In some cases, when we modify table from stream, it won't be a problem, but i use
use_partitioner
and modify table bytask
, and for me this is a big problem.So i add extra logic for memory store, that stores partitions for keys. Also added clearing no longer used keys on the worker after recovery from table.