Skip to content

Calendar hotfix 2 #1293

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 5, 2025
Merged

Calendar hotfix 2 #1293

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 5, 2025

Conversation

duckduckhero
Copy link
Collaborator

@duckduckhero duckduckhero commented Aug 5, 2025

Summary by cubic

Fixed participant adding logic in the calendar note view to prevent duplicate or deleted users from being re-added.

  • Bug Fixes
  • Skips adding participants with missing emails or already present in the session.
  • Ensures deleted users are not re-added.
  • Simplifies code for handling new and existing participants.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 5, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The participant synchronization logic in the beforeLoad hook of the note route was refactored. Redundant tracking of processed emails and names was removed. The new implementation focuses only on participants with valid emails, streamlining the process of adding or creating participants and omitting previous checks for missing or duplicate names.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Participant Sync Refactor
apps/desktop/src/routes/app.note.$id.tsx
Refactored participant synchronization logic to remove redundant sets and counters, focusing solely on participants with valid emails. Simplified the flow by eliminating checks for missing/duplicate names and emails, and streamlined participant addition/creation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • before merge #1292: Simplified participant synchronization by removing logic for handling and deduplicating participants without emails, which was previously introduced to avoid duplicates by name.

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a18ce50 and ba292ab.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/desktop/src/routes/app.note.$id.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.{js,ts,tsx,rs}

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.{js,ts,tsx,rs}: 1. No error handling.
2. No unused imports, variables, or functions.
3. For comments, keep it minimal. It should be about "Why", not "What".

Files:

  • apps/desktop/src/routes/app.note.$id.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: ci (macos, macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: ci (windows, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: zizmor
🔇 Additional comments (6)
apps/desktop/src/routes/app.note.$id.tsx (6)

60-63: LGTM!

Clean guard clause with appropriate "why" comment that prevents processing participants without essential email data.


65-68: LGTM!

Efficient duplicate check using Set lookup with clear reasoning in the comment about why participants are skipped.


70-71: LGTM!

Clear logic for finding existing humans by email. The streamlined approach improves readability compared to the previous tracking-based implementation.


73-81: LGTM!

Proper handling of existing humans with efficient deleted participant check using Set lookup. The logic flow is clear and prevents re-adding deleted participants.


81-97: LGTM!

Well-implemented new human creation with good defensive programming. The fallback for displayName and use of upsertHuman provides robustness against edge cases and potential race conditions.


59-98: Excellent refactoring that streamlines participant synchronization.

The removal of redundant tracking variables (processedEmails, processedNames, addedCount) significantly improves code clarity while maintaining the same functionality. The new linear flow is easier to follow and reason about.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch calendar-hotfix-2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cubic analysis

1 issue found across 1 file • Review in cubic

React with 👍 or 👎 to teach cubic. You can also tag @cubic-dev-ai to give feedback, ask questions, or re-run the review.

if (participant.name) {
processedNames.add(participant.name);
const createdHuman = await dbCommands.upsertHuman(newHuman);
await dbCommands.sessionAddParticipant(id, createdHuman.id);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The set that tracks existing participant emails is not updated after a successful insertion, so duplicate emails within eventParticipants can cause multiple sessionAddParticipant calls for the same human, risking database duplication errors and unnecessary work.

Prompt for AI agents
Address the following comment on apps/desktop/src/routes/app.note.$id.tsx at line 96:

<comment>The set that tracks existing participant emails is not updated after a successful insertion, so duplicate emails within eventParticipants can cause multiple sessionAddParticipant calls for the same human, risking database duplication errors and unnecessary work.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -120,15 +92,8 @@ export const Route = createFileRoute(&quot;/app/note/$id&quot;)({
                     linkedin_username: null,
                   };
 
-                  humanToAdd = await dbCommands.upsertHuman(newHuman);
-                }
-
-                if (humanToAdd) {
-                  await dbCommands.sessionAddParticipant(id, humanToAdd.id);
-                  addedCount++;
</file context>

@duckduckhero duckduckhero merged commit 1abeb8a into main Aug 5, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant