-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 919
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Const correctness + Driver version update #1305
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Nathan Baker <nathan.baker@sysdig.com> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Donato <leodidonato@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Leonardo Di Donato <leodidonato@gmail.com>
/milestone 0.24.0 |
@nathan-b: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 21ae31d314350eb9d6b0d88ce9d6345ef9ee4e8f
|
/cc @leogr |
/hold do not cancel hold please |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fntlnz, leogr, nathan-b The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold cancel |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
Any specific area of the project related to this PR?
/area build
/area engine
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR pairs with the one on libsinsp (draios/sysdig#1635) making
sinsp_evt
andsinsp_threadinfo
passable around as const.It updates part of the Falco engine accordingly.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Refs draios/sysdig#1635
Special notes for your reviewer:
Driver version updated to 85c88952b018fdbce2464222c3303229f5bfcfad.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: