You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue will explore the possibility of a case insensitive :contains(). Since we are thinking about expanding :contains() to allow lists, it may make sense to try and do something like what attribute selectors do: :contains(text i). Or maybe we need to create our own custom pseudo class that implements a case insensitive version, such as :icontains().
Nothing currently is settled, and whether this gets implemented or not and what the name of the pseudo-class would be is still up in the air.
While this may still be worth doing, if we decide to move forward with #175, you could work around this with case insensitive regex. Going either way with these is non-standard. We can do one or both.
Activity
facelessuser commentedon Feb 22, 2019
I guess you could get away with something like
:contains(text i, "more text" i). It is easy enough to parse, just not sure how I feel about it though.facelessuser commentedon Jan 26, 2020
While this may still be worth doing, if we decide to move forward with #175, you could work around this with case insensitive regex. Going either way with these is non-standard. We can do one or both.