Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Flow to 0.37.1 #8608

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2016
Merged

Conversation

sebmarkbage
Copy link
Collaborator

Nothing really changes.

Might as well upgrade.

Nothing really changes.
@sebmarkbage sebmarkbage merged commit b49210f into facebook:master Dec 20, 2016
jackjocross added a commit to jackjocross/react that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2017
Nothing really changes.
gaearon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2017
* devDependencies: add core-js and es6-symbol polyfill for tests

* Update Flow and fix issues (#8006)

* Add npm v4.0.0 support (#8082)

* Add support for node v7 (#8135)

* Upgrade ESLint and dependencies, fix new lint errors, switch Travis to Yarn (#8309)

* Update ESLint to 3.10.2

Also pull in fbjs for extending properly, per @zpao. This also disables consistent-return, which has about 80 failing cases in React currently. If we'd like to turn this back on, we should do it separately and fix all the call sites properly (rather than just adding 'return undefined;' everywhere, which adds no value.

Fixes to all existing lint errors plus an update for yarn.lock to follow.

* Update yarn.lock after the eslint update.

* Fix all new eslint failures

Unfortunately I had to add three eslint-disable-next-line instances. All have explanations inline.

* Switch Travis to use yarn instead of npm

* Update all Jest packages to 17.x (#8327)

* Update all Jest packages to 17.x, cache babel-jest transforms

* Remove the caching

Looking at the other builds it doesn't seem to actually be that necessary.  The bottleneck is executors, not build time.

* Remove unnecessary package, fix fiber test runner

* Regenerate yarn lockfile

* Update Flow to 0.37.0 (#8608)

Nothing really changes.

* Update to Jest 18 (#8621)

* mockImpl -> mockImplementation

D4329549

* Fixed linting errors

* circle.yml and circleci scripts

* Update Flow and fix issues (#8006)

* Fixed flow errors

* Updated shrinkwrap

* Removed unnecessary change

* Added jest --runInBand flag

* Removed ReactDOMFiber changes
gaearon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2017
* devDependencies: add core-js and es6-symbol polyfill for tests

* Update Flow and fix issues (#8006)

* Add npm v4.0.0 support (#8082)

* Add support for node v7 (#8135)

* Upgrade ESLint and dependencies, fix new lint errors, switch Travis to Yarn (#8309)

* Update ESLint to 3.10.2

Also pull in fbjs for extending properly, per @zpao. This also disables consistent-return, which has about 80 failing cases in React currently. If we'd like to turn this back on, we should do it separately and fix all the call sites properly (rather than just adding 'return undefined;' everywhere, which adds no value.

Fixes to all existing lint errors plus an update for yarn.lock to follow.

* Update yarn.lock after the eslint update.

* Fix all new eslint failures

Unfortunately I had to add three eslint-disable-next-line instances. All have explanations inline.

* Switch Travis to use yarn instead of npm

* Update all Jest packages to 17.x (#8327)

* Update all Jest packages to 17.x, cache babel-jest transforms

* Remove the caching

Looking at the other builds it doesn't seem to actually be that necessary.  The bottleneck is executors, not build time.

* Remove unnecessary package, fix fiber test runner

* Regenerate yarn lockfile

* Update Flow to 0.37.0 (#8608)

Nothing really changes.

* Update to Jest 18 (#8621)

* mockImpl -> mockImplementation

D4329549

* Fixed linting errors

* circle.yml and circleci scripts

* Update Flow and fix issues (#8006)

* Fixed flow errors

* Updated shrinkwrap

* Removed unnecessary change

* Added jest --runInBand flag

* Removed ReactDOMFiber changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants