-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48.7k
[commit] Better error message for invalid hoisting #33504
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
josephsavona
wants to merge
6
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
pr33504
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+9,638
−476
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jun 11, 2025
This was referenced Jun 11, 2025
Squashed, review-friendly version of the stack from #33488. This is new version of our mutability and inference model, designed to replace the core algorithm for determining the sets of instructions involved in constructing a given value or set of values. The new model replaces InferReferenceEffects, InferMutableRanges (and all of its subcomponents), and parts of AnalyzeFunctions. The new model does not use per-Place effect values, but in order to make this drop-in the end _result_ of the inference adds these per-Place effects. I'll write up a larger document on the model, first i'm doing some housekeeping to rebase the PR.
AnalyzeFunctions had logic to reset the mutable ranges of context variables after visiting inner function expressions. However, there was a bug in that logic: InferReactiveScopeVariables makes all the identifiers in a scope point to the same mutable range instance. That meant that it was possible for a later function expression to indirectly cause an earlier function expressions' context variables to get a non-zero mutable range. The fix is to not just reset start/end of context var ranges, but assign a new range instance. Thanks for the help on debugging, @mofeiZ!
We're already tracking which variables are hoisted context variables, so if we see a mutation of a frozen value we can emit a custom error message to help users identify the problem.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We're already tracking which variables are hoisted context variables, so if we see a mutation of a frozen value we can emit a custom error message to help users identify the problem.
Stack created with Sapling. Best reviewed with ReviewStack.