-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lazy components must use React.lazy #13885
Merged
acdlite
merged 1 commit into
facebook:master
from
acdlite:lazy-components-must-use-react-lazy
Oct 19, 2018
Merged
Lazy components must use React.lazy #13885
acdlite
merged 1 commit into
facebook:master
from
acdlite:lazy-components-must-use-react-lazy
Oct 19, 2018
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Details of bundled changes.Comparing: 0648ca6...173ed32 scheduler
Generated by 🚫 dangerJS |
acdlite
force-pushed
the
lazy-components-must-use-react-lazy
branch
from
October 19, 2018 01:09
83f226a
to
738f23f
Compare
acdlite
force-pushed
the
lazy-components-must-use-react-lazy
branch
from
October 19, 2018 01:39
738f23f
to
270fb63
Compare
Removes support for using arbitrary promises as the type of a React element. Instead, promises must be wrapped in React.lazy. This gives us flexibility later if we need to change the protocol. The reason is that promises do not provide a way to call their constructor multiple times. For example: const promiseForA = new Promise(resolve => { fetchA(a => resolve(a)); }); Given a reference to `promiseForA`, there's no way to call `fetchA` again. Calling `then` on the promise doesn't run the constructor again; it only attaches another listener. In the future we will likely introduce an API like `React.eager` that is similar to `lazy` but eagerly calls the constructor. That gives us the ability to call the constructor multiple times. E.g. to increase the priority, or to retry if the first operation failed.
acdlite
force-pushed
the
lazy-components-must-use-react-lazy
branch
from
October 19, 2018 02:21
270fb63
to
22cdad1
Compare
sebmarkbage
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2018
acdlite
force-pushed
the
lazy-components-must-use-react-lazy
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 19, 2018 02:49
6298bb4
to
173ed32
Compare
linjiajian999
pushed a commit
to linjiajian999/react
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2018
Removes support for using arbitrary promises as the type of a React element. Instead, promises must be wrapped in React.lazy. This gives us flexibility later if we need to change the protocol. The reason is that promises do not provide a way to call their constructor multiple times. For example: const promiseForA = new Promise(resolve => { fetchA(a => resolve(a)); }); Given a reference to `promiseForA`, there's no way to call `fetchA` again. Calling `then` on the promise doesn't run the constructor again; it only attaches another listener. In the future we will likely introduce an API like `React.eager` that is similar to `lazy` but eagerly calls the constructor. That gives us the ability to call the constructor multiple times. E.g. to increase the priority, or to retry if the first operation failed.
Merged
This was referenced Oct 24, 2018
Awesome |
This was referenced Oct 29, 2018
This was referenced Dec 1, 2018
jetoneza
pushed a commit
to jetoneza/react
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2019
Removes support for using arbitrary promises as the type of a React element. Instead, promises must be wrapped in React.lazy. This gives us flexibility later if we need to change the protocol. The reason is that promises do not provide a way to call their constructor multiple times. For example: const promiseForA = new Promise(resolve => { fetchA(a => resolve(a)); }); Given a reference to `promiseForA`, there's no way to call `fetchA` again. Calling `then` on the promise doesn't run the constructor again; it only attaches another listener. In the future we will likely introduce an API like `React.eager` that is similar to `lazy` but eagerly calls the constructor. That gives us the ability to call the constructor multiple times. E.g. to increase the priority, or to retry if the first operation failed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Note: This proposal has been discussed in reactjs/rfcs#64.
Removes support in master for using arbitrary promises as the type of a React element. Instead, promises must be wrapped in
React.lazy
. This gives us flexibility later if we need to change the protocol.The reason is that promises do not provide a way to call their constructor multiple times. For example:
Given a reference to
promiseForA
, there's no way to callfetchA
again. Callingthen
on the promise doesn't run the constructor again; it only attaches another listener.In the future we will likely introduce an API like
React.eager
that is similar tolazy
but eagerly calls the constructor. That gives us the ability to call the constructor multiple times. E.g. to increase the priority, or to retry if the first operation failed.