-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Exclude generation of app-defined components from RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider #47176
Conversation
…ComponentsProvider Summary: While writing the guide for the New Architecture, we realized that we need to exclude the generation of the Cls function in the RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider for components defined in the app. This is needed because a component that is defined in the app will have those function defined in the app project. However, the RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider is generated in Fabric, inside the Pods project. The pod project needs to build in isolation from the app and cocoapods then link the app to the pods project. But the compilation of the pods project fails if one of the symbol needed by the pods lives in the app. By disabling the generation of that function in th RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider, we can successfully build the app. The downside is that the user needs to register the component manually, but this is not an issue because if they are writing a component in the app space, they have all the information tomanually register it in the AppDelegate ## Changelog [iOS][Fixed] - Do not generate the ComponentCls function in the RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider for components deined in the app. Differential Revision: D64739896
This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D64739896 |
This pull request has been merged in dc7e9e2. |
This pull request was successfully merged by @cipolleschi in dc7e9e2 When will my fix make it into a release? | How to file a pick request? |
…ComponentsProvider (#47176) Summary: Pull Request resolved: #47176 While writing the guide for the New Architecture, we realized that we need to exclude the generation of the Cls function in the RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider for components defined in the app. This is needed because a component that is defined in the app will have those function defined in the app project. However, the RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider is generated in Fabric, inside the Pods project. The pod project needs to build in isolation from the app and cocoapods then link the app to the pods project. But the compilation of the pods project fails if one of the symbol needed by the pods lives in the app. By disabling the generation of that function in th RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider, we can successfully build the app. The downside is that the user needs to register the component manually, but this is not an issue because if they are writing a component in the app space, they have all the information tomanually register it in the AppDelegate ## Changelog [iOS][Fixed] - Do not generate the ComponentCls function in the RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider for components deined in the app. Reviewed By: cortinico, blakef Differential Revision: D64739896 fbshipit-source-id: 0eca818ea0198532a611377d14a3ff4c95cb5fe3
Hey @blakef, What is I'm on v0.76.1 |
Summary: In [facebook#47176](facebook#47176) we disabled the generation of the component registration for app specific components as it was creating a circular dependency between the app and React Native. However, we made a couple of typos that make it not work as expected and users picked up those typos soon. This change fixes them for good. ## Changelog [iOS][Fixed] - Properly stop generating component registration for components defined in app. Differential Revision: D65750433
…47547) Summary: Pull Request resolved: #47547 In [#47176](#47176) we disabled the generation of the component registration for app specific components as it was creating a circular dependency between the app and React Native. However, we made a couple of typos that make it not work as expected and users picked up those typos soon. This change fixes them for good. ## Changelog [iOS][Fixed] - Properly stop generating component registration for components defined in app. Reviewed By: blakef Differential Revision: D65750433 fbshipit-source-id: 1a879c5be014905558b9fd05e6f16ac36b784ed6
…47547) Summary: Pull Request resolved: #47547 In [#47176](#47176) we disabled the generation of the component registration for app specific components as it was creating a circular dependency between the app and React Native. However, we made a couple of typos that make it not work as expected and users picked up those typos soon. This change fixes them for good. ## Changelog [iOS][Fixed] - Properly stop generating component registration for components defined in app. Reviewed By: blakef Differential Revision: D65750433 fbshipit-source-id: 1a879c5be014905558b9fd05e6f16ac36b784ed6
Summary:
While writing the guide for the New Architecture, we realized that we need to exclude the generation of the Cls function in the RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider for components defined in the app.
This is needed because a component that is defined in the app will have those function defined in the app project. However, the RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider is generated in Fabric, inside the Pods project.
The pod project needs to build in isolation from the app and cocoapods then link the app to the pods project. But the compilation of the pods project fails if one of the symbol needed by the pods lives in the app.
By disabling the generation of that function in th RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider, we can successfully build the app.
The downside is that the user needs to register the component manually, but this is not an issue because if they are writing a component in the app space, they have all the information tomanually register it in the AppDelegate
Changelog
[iOS][Fixed] - Do not generate the ComponentCls function in the RCTThirdPartyFabricComponentsProvider for components deined in the app.
Differential Revision: D64739896