-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.3k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Summary: TL;DR: For applications using JS navigation, save 50-95% of CPU during mounting phase in N>2 navigations that replace ~most of screen. During investigation of performance on the UI thread of React Native applications, I noticed that the /initial/ render of an screen for an application using JS navigation is /mostly/ consumed (on the UI thread) by tearing-down the previous View hierarchy. In one 185ms segment on the UI thread in production, 95% of the CPU time was Remove/Delete instructions and only 5% of CPU time was consumed by actually displaying the new hierarchy (this is specific to Android and also assumes that View Preallocation is being used, so post-commit work consists of Insert and UpdateLayout mutations primarily). There are /some/ cases where the C++ differ knows that we are deleting an entire subtree and therefore we could communicate this to the mounting layer. All that matters is that these Views are removed from the View hierarchy immediately; and secondarily that their memory is cleaned up ASAP, but that doesn't need to happen immediately. Some additional constraints and notes: 1) As noted in the comments, we cannot simply stop producing Remove and Delete instructions. We need to produce /both/ the new RemoveDeleteTree instruction, /and/ produce all the Remove/Delete instructions, primarily because LayoutAnimations relies heavily on these Remove/Delete instructions and certain things would break if we removed those instructions entirely. However, we can mark those Remove/Delete instructions as redundant, process them only in LayoutAnimations, and not send them to the Android mounting layer. 2) We want to make sure that View Recycling is not impacted. Since Android cannot take advantage of View Recycling until /after/ the second major render (preallocation of views will happen before any views are recycled), this doesn't impact View Recycling and we'll make sure Views are recycled whenever they are deleted. Thus, we do two things: 1) Introduce a new RemoveDeleteTree operation that can delete an entire subtree recursively as part of one operation. This allows us to avoid serializing hundreds or thousands of instructions and prevents JNI traffic. 2) Besides removing the topmost View from the View hierarchy, and ensuring it's not drawn, the full teardown and recycling of the tree can happen /after/ the paint. In some flows with JS navigation this saves us 95% of CPU during the mount phase. In the general case it is probably closer to 25-50% of CPU time that is saved and/or deferred. Changelog: [Android][Changed] Significant perf optimization to Fabric Remove/Delete operations Reviewed By: ryancat Differential Revision: D37257864 fbshipit-source-id: a7d33fc74683939965cfb98be4db7890644110b2
- Loading branch information
1 parent
d666eb7
commit b6bbbf8
Showing
13 changed files
with
398 additions
and
16 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.