Correct cache expiration value calculation #59
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
Not sure of the cause of the "Couldn't find a repository matching this job." error in the Coverage step but it seems to happen consistently with other PRs. |
Owner
|
Yes, looks like is failing with the matching job error if the PR is created by other user other than me. I'll try to find another solution for the coverage check in Github actions or remove it. Nice work! |
ezeoleaf
approved these changes
Jun 14, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request fixes #58 by calculating the cache expiration minutes using the cache size * periodicity algorithm.