Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughRenames and gates the integration-tests workflow; adds PR trigger and working-directory scoping. Enhances python-sdk publish/release workflows with SBOM generation, pip-audit vulnerability reporting, provenance-enabled publish, and artifact uploads. Updates README badges and adds a Supply Chain Security section to python-sdk docs. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor Dev as Developer
participant GH as GitHub Actions
participant Job as publish-python-sdk Job
participant PyPI as PyPI
Dev->>GH: Push (publish trigger)
GH->>Job: Start job (wd: python-sdk)
Job->>Job: Export requirements.txt
Job->>Job: Install cyclonedx-bom, pip-audit
Job->>Job: Generate CycloneDX SBOM (JSON)
Job->>Job: Run pip-audit (non-blocking) -> vulnerability-report.json
Job->>GH: Upload sbom-artifacts (SBOM, requirements, vuln report)
Job->>PyPI: uv publish --provenance (skip if version exists)
Note over Job,PyPI: Provenance attestation produced during publish
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor RelEng as Release Engineer
participant GH as GitHub Actions
participant Rel as release-python-sdk Job
participant PyPI as PyPI
participant GHRel as GitHub Release
RelEng->>GH: Push tag (release trigger)
GH->>Rel: Start job (after version check)
Rel->>Rel: Export requirements.txt
Rel->>Rel: Install cyclonedx-bom, pip-audit
Rel->>Rel: Generate SBOM (JSON & XML)
Rel->>Rel: Run pip-audit (non-blocking) -> vulnerability-report.json
Rel->>Rel: Create sbom-summary.md
Rel->>PyPI: uv publish --provenance
Rel->>GH: Upload SBOM artifacts (90-day retention)
Rel->>GHRel: Attach SBOM artifacts and summary to release
Note over Rel,GHRel: Release body appended with SBOM summary
sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor Any as Any event
participant GH as GitHub Actions
participant IT as integration-tests Job
Any->>GH: Event triggers workflow
GH->>IT: Evaluate `if: github.repository == ...`
alt repository matches
IT->>IT: Run with defaults.run.working-directory = integration-tests
else
IT--xGH: Job skipped
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro 💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @NiveditJain, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request enhances the project's documentation by adding a status badge for integration tests to the README.md file. While the title suggests the addition of the tests themselves, this change specifically focuses on improving the visibility and accessibility of their current status via a GitHub Actions workflow badge.
Highlights
- Integration Test Visibility: A new badge has been added to the README.md file, providing a direct visual indicator of the status of the project's integration tests.
- README Update: The README.md file now includes a link to the integration-tests.yml GitHub Actions workflow, allowing quick access to test results.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds a status badge for the integration tests workflow to the README.md file. The change is functional, but for better consistency with other badges in the file, I've suggested using shields.io. Additionally, the pull request title 'Adding actual integration tests' is a bit misleading since the change only adds a badge; a title like 'docs: Add integration test status badge' would be more accurate.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- Updated integration-tests.yml to set a working directory for tests. - Added SBOM generation steps in publish-python-sdk.yml and release-python-sdk.yml, including tools installation, SBOM creation in JSON and XML formats, and vulnerability report generation. - Updated README.md to document supply chain security features, including package provenance, SBOM details, and verification instructions for enhanced transparency and security compliance.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/integration-tests.yml (1)
56-57: Mongo auth likely fails without authSource=admin.Root user is created in the admin DB; add authSource to the URI.
- MONGO_URI: mongodb://admin:password@localhost:27017 + MONGO_URI: mongodb://admin:password@localhost:27017/?authSource=admin
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
README.md (1)
12-12: Badge choice looks good; consistent with shields.io.Matches prior suggestion to use shields.io for uniformity. No further action.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/integration-tests.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/publish-python-sdk.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/release-python-sdk.yml(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)python-sdk/README.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/release-python-sdk.yml
[error] 193-193: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
[error] 193-193: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/workflows/integration-tests.yml
[error] 15-15: wrong indentation: expected 12 but found 10
(indentation)
[error] 16-16: wrong indentation: expected 14 but found 12
(indentation)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md
12-12: Inline HTML
Element: a
(MD033, no-inline-html)
12-12: Inline HTML
Element: img
(MD033, no-inline-html)
🪛 LanguageTool
python-sdk/README.md
[grammar] ~82-~82: Use correct spacing
Context: ...s or clusters) ## Supply Chain Security The ExosphereHost Python SDK includes co...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~84-~84: Use correct spacing
Context: ...sure package integrity and transparency: ### Package Provenance All releases are pub...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~86-~86: Use correct spacing
Context: ...nd transparency: ### Package Provenance All releases are published with cryptogr...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~88-~88: Use correct spacing
Context: ...d the Sigstore ecosystem. This provides: - Cryptographic proof that packages were...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~90-~90: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...by the official ExosphereHost repository - Tamper detection to verify packages ha...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~91-~91: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ... haven't been modified after publication - Build transparency showing exactly how...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~92-~92: Use correct spacing
Context: ...ctly how and where packages were created ### Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) Each ...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~94-~94: Use correct spacing
Context: ...d ### Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) Each release includes a complete Softwar...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~96-~96: Use correct spacing
Context: ...s in industry-standard CycloneDX format: - Complete dependency inventory listing ...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~98-~98: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...g all direct and transitive dependencies - Vulnerability scanning results for all...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~99-~99: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ... scanning** results for all dependencies - License compliance information for ent...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~100-~100: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ... information for enterprise environments - Version tracking for security auditing...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~101-~101: Use correct spacing
Context: ...g** for security auditing and compliance ### Verification You can verify the authent...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~103-~103: Use correct spacing
Context: ...uditing and compliance ### Verification You can verify the authenticity of any E...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~105-~105: Use correct spacing
Context: ...thenticity of any ExosphereHost package: bash # Install verification tools pip install sigstore # Verify package provenance (replace X.Y.Z with actual version) python -m sigstore verify --bundle <bundle-file> exospherehost==X.Y.Z ### Security Artifacts For each release, yo...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~115-~115: Use correct spacing
Context: ...ehost==X.Y.Z ``` ### Security Artifacts For each release, you can find the follo...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~117-~117: Use correct spacing
Context: ...n find the following security artifacts: - SBOM files (JSON and XML formats) atta...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~119-~119: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...XML formats) attached to GitHub releases - Vulnerability reports showing security...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~120-~120: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ... reports** showing security scan results - Provenance attestations available on P...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~121-~121: There might be a mistake here.
Context: ...venance attestations** available on PyPI - Build logs publicly available in GitHu...
(QB_NEW_EN)
[grammar] ~122-~122: Use correct spacing
Context: ...s** publicly available in GitHub Actions These features align with modern softwar...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
[grammar] ~124-~124: Use correct spacing
Context: ...p meet enterprise security requirements. ## Architecture The SDK is built around tw...
(QB_NEW_EN_OTHER_ERROR_IDS_5)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/publish-python-sdk.yml (1)
118-126: Artifact paths are correct with defaults.run; LGTM.Artifacts resolve under python-sdk as intended.
python-sdk/README.md (1)
107-113: Use pypi-attestations for PEP 740 provenance verification
In python-sdk/README.md (lines 107–113), replace the current Sigstore snippet with:# Install verification tools pip install pypi-attestations # Verify PyPI package provenance (replace <repository-url> and <package>.whl) pypi-attestations verify pypi --repository <repository-url> pypi:<package>.whlFor fully offline bundle verification, retain Sigstore:
pip install sigstore python -m sigstore verify identity \ --bundle <artifact>.sigstore \ --cert-identity <identity> \ --cert-oidc-issuer <issuer-url> \ <artifact>
… the main branch - Added pull_request event configuration to the integration-tests.yml file, specifying paths for integration tests, state manager, and Python SDK to ensure proper testing on PRs.
- Updated publish-python-sdk.yml and release-python-sdk.yml to generate requirements.txt from the lockfile for improved dependency management. - Added version checks before publishing to PyPI to prevent overwriting existing versions. - Included version output for installed SBOM generation tools to ensure transparency in the CI process.
1 participant
No description provided.