[Roman Numerals] Draft of Approaches #3605
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I think my latest changes get the directory structure about right, and linting now passes. There are still a small number of TODOs in the markdown. |
colinleach
changed the title
colinleach
changed the title
BethanyG
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2024
exercises/practice/roman-numerals/.approaches/itertools-starmap/content.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
exercises/practice/roman-numerals/.approaches/itertools-starmap/content.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
exercises/practice/roman-numerals/.approaches/recurse-match/content.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
exercises/practice/roman-numerals/.approaches/recurse-match/content.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
exercises/practice/roman-numerals/.approaches/recurse-match/content.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Didn't register your question at first - apologies!
Would the equivalent be a |
Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
…ntent.md Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
…ntent.md Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
…ntent.md Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
Don't worry, I moved past that in the most recent commit. I thought about it and left it out. Feel free to add it back in if you want to, but it doesn't excite me. |
…n into approach-roman-numerals
|
With an analysis added for |
Found a mistake already
BethanyG
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2024
exercises/practice/roman-numerals/.approaches/itertools-starmap/content.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
exercises/practice/roman-numerals/.approaches/itertools-starmap/content.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Pushing the big green button! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Don't take this too seriously yet, it's clearly incomplete and I'll push updates when I have them. The empty files will also make it fail the CI checks, I expect - whatever, it's not for merging.
If you run out of rabbit holes to get lost down, take a look at the
with-itertoolsapproach. Somebody clearly had fun coming up with the most cryptic code possible, so explaining it is a challenge that I'm still working on (not as the most urgent priority).There are a couple of placeholders:
pattern-matchingfrom Scalafold-listfrom KotlinI expect we could come up with Python versions of these, but I have some doubts about whether it's worthwhile. Thoughts?