Skip to content

[New Workflow] Bot to automatically reply to new issues #2684

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 22, 2021

Conversation

J08K
Copy link
Member

@J08K J08K commented Oct 21, 2021

@BethanyG and I have been working on new workflows for the repo.

This is the first thing we're adding, a bot that automatically replies to new issues with the text that is in .github/issue-comment.md.

We are also almost done with a PR commenter, but we want to have another look at that ourselves.

This has been tested in a private repo, so let's hope it works!

@BethanyG BethanyG requested a review from iHiD October 21, 2021 17:30
@BethanyG
Copy link
Member

@iHiD - Pinging you to give a quick once-over, since I've gotten feedback on other things that I am too verbose. Also want to make sure this doesn't sound to aggressive or out-of -step with other messaging/communications. Thanks!

@BethanyG
Copy link
Member

@J08K - Thank you very much for this! 🌟 💜

@BethanyG
Copy link
Member

BethanyG commented Oct 21, 2021

Screengrab of the message, since the markdown is difficult to read. 😄

image

Co-authored-by: BethanyG <BethanyG@users.noreply.github.com>
@iHiD
Copy link
Member

iHiD commented Oct 22, 2021

This looks great 🙂

One general comment would be to replace the diamonds for bullets with -. I think it will make less noise (and let the other emojis stand out more), and it's probably also more a11y-friendly.

One specific comment: "This will make us sad" - I'd consider changing that to a little more about the why - "This often results in very long review cycles which can be avoided by opening issues to discuss first" or something. I don't know why it would make you sad, and that ambiguity feels "off" to me.

I'd also probably one go with one "💛" rather than "💛💙" just to save on noise.

Other than that, great! :)

@J08K
Copy link
Member Author

J08K commented Oct 22, 2021

Awesome, thank you for the feedback, Jeremy. I'll make some changes and test them in the private repo. Will update the PR when ready👍

@BethanyG
Copy link
Member

@iHiD - Thanks for the feedback! I had a feeling I was being too emoji-tastic. 😉 😄 . Here's an update:

2021-10-22_09-17-29

@J08K -- the "updated" text is in the [ignore] issue. I'll PR shortly.

@J08K
Copy link
Member Author

J08K commented Oct 22, 2021

Cool! I shall update the PR after dinner!

@J08K J08K requested a review from BethanyG October 22, 2021 20:14
Copy link
Member

@BethanyG BethanyG left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome work! Thank you for doing this, @J08K. 🌟

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
x:size/large Large amount of work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants