Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typos, formatting, and inconsistent definitions #167

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Typos, formatting, and inconsistent definitions #167

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Isweet
Copy link
Contributor

@Isweet Isweet commented Mar 10, 2016

  1. Typo in equation (105), the 3rd return value shouldn't be \textbf{s} (which represents suicides), it should be A to represent substate.
  2. Also in (105), definition was overlapping with equation label, so added some extra whitespace with \qquad
  3. The definition of \Xi expanded the substate in the return, which I think is confusing. I changed it back to A. If you think this is confusing, I think the reader should be redirected back to the definition of substate in section 6.1
  4. The definition of O, the stepping function, was defined as taking a tuple, but was called in the definition of X as a function of four arguments. Since O never takes the result of another function which returns a tuple, it makes more sense to define it in function notation.

@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ \subsection{The Transaction} \label{ch:transaction}
\item[gasLimit] A scalar value equal to the maximum amount of gas that should be used in executing this transaction. This is paid up-front, before any computation is done and may not be increased later; formally $T_g$.
\item[to] The 160-bit address of the message call's recipient or, for a contract creation transaction, $\varnothing$, used here to denote the only member of $\mathbb{B}_0$ ; formally $T_t$.
\item[value] A scalar value equal to the number of Wei to be transferred to the message call's recipient or, in the case of contract creation, as an endowment to the newly created account; formally $T_v$.
\item[v, r, s] Values corresponding to the signature of the transaction and used to determine the sender of the transaction; formally $T_w$, $T_r$ and $T_s$. This is expanded in Appendix \ref{app:signing}.
\item[w, r, s] Values corresponding to the signature of the transaction and used to determine the sender of the transaction; formally $T_w$, $T_r$ and $T_s$. This is expanded in Appendix \ref{app:signing}.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not a typo.

@gavofyork
Copy link
Contributor

gavofyork commented Sep 22, 2016

mostly good, but @subtly 's comment is correct

Copy link
Contributor

@gavofyork gavofyork left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

v/w alteration incorrect.

@axic
Copy link
Member

axic commented Mar 23, 2017

@Isweet can you please rebase and apply the requested changes?

Copy link
Contributor

@gavofyork gavofyork left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still looking for that rebase/conflict resolution.

@Isweet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Isweet commented Mar 30, 2017

Will take care of this over the weekend.

@Isweet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Isweet commented Apr 1, 2017

This PR was pretty outdated w.r.t. the current document, so I created a fresh PR (#283) that addresses the issues which were not addressed already (namely, only equation 105 still had one formatting issue and did not refer to A)

@Isweet Isweet closed this Apr 1, 2017
pirapira added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2017
Fix remaining issues from PR #167, namely equation 105
pirapira pushed a commit to pirapira/yellowpaper that referenced this pull request Apr 25, 2017
pirapira pushed a commit to pirapira/yellowpaper that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2018
pirapira pushed a commit to pirapira/yellowpaper that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2018
pirapira pushed a commit to pirapira/yellowpaper that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants