Skip to content

Conversation

@rizkyikiw42
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR fixes a bug in the Ledger hardware wallet version validation logic for EIP-155 transaction signing. The original condition incorrectly allowed older versions that don't support EIP-155 such as 0.9.9 and 0.1.5 to proceed.

Copy link
Member

@gballet gballet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirmed with ledger. This is the reference commit LedgerHQ/app-ethereum@54ea8ac

@gballet gballet added this to the 1.16.3 milestone Aug 21, 2025
@gballet gballet changed the title accounts: correct version comparison logic accounts/usbwallet: correct version comparison logic Aug 21, 2025
@gballet gballet merged commit 94ecd1d into ethereum:master Aug 21, 2025
4 of 8 checks passed
gzliudan pushed a commit to gzliudan/XDPoSChain that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2025
This PR fixes a bug in the Ledger hardware wallet version validation
logic for EIP-155 transaction signing. The original condition
incorrectly allowed older versions that don't support EIP-155 such as
0.9.9 and 0.1.5 to proceed.
gzliudan added a commit to XinFinOrg/XDPoSChain that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2025
…1430)

This PR fixes a bug in the Ledger hardware wallet version validation
logic for EIP-155 transaction signing. The original condition
incorrectly allowed older versions that don't support EIP-155 such as
0.9.9 and 0.1.5 to proceed.

Co-authored-by: Rizky Ikwan <rizzikwann@gmail.com>
gballet pushed a commit to gballet/go-ethereum that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2025
## Description

This PR fixes a bug in the Ledger hardware wallet version validation
logic for EIP-155 transaction signing. The original condition
incorrectly allowed older versions that don't support EIP-155 such as
0.9.9 and 0.1.5 to proceed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants