Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core, core/state: throw out intermediate state #1369

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 4, 2015

Conversation

obscuren
Copy link
Contributor

SyncIntermediate only updates whatever has changed, but, as a side
effect, requires much more disk space.

SyncObjects will only sync whatever is required for a block and will not
save intermediate state to disk. As drawback this requires more time
when more txs come in.

@obscuren obscuren force-pushed the statedb-update-cleanup branch 3 times, most recently from 0f66e0a to 2955ab7 Compare July 1, 2015 10:08
@obscuren obscuren added the core label Jul 1, 2015
@obscuren obscuren added this to the 0.9.36 milestone Jul 1, 2015
@obscuren obscuren changed the title core, core/state: only write necessary state. Skip intermediate core, core/state: throw out intermediate state Jul 1, 2015
@obscuren obscuren force-pushed the statedb-update-cleanup branch 3 times, most recently from d36291b to 886fa11 Compare July 3, 2015 15:28
* Update => SyncIntermediate
* Added SyncObjects

SyncIntermediate only updates whatever has changed, but, as a side
effect, requires much more disk space.

SyncObjects will only sync whatever is required for a block and will not
save intermediate state to disk. As drawback this requires more time
when more txs come in.
obscuren added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2015
core, core/state: throw out intermediate state
@obscuren obscuren merged commit 9c3db1b into ethereum:develop Jul 4, 2015
karalabe pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2019
swarm/network: add want delay timer to syncing (#1367)

swarm/network: synchronise peer.close() (#1369)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant