-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add EIP: On-chain upgrade signaling #9174
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
File
|
The commit 6ff93a5 (as a parent of fb9bdfb) contains errors. |
not sure if this proposal is relevant to eth cc @SamWilsn as we may never go down this path |
Relevance should be based on whether this is an implementable proposal and if I can be heard. Hopefully it is and this can be merged as DRAFT. And then LATER, a stricter test is whether to implement this. |
EIPS/eip-9174.md
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ | |||
--- | |||
eip: 9174 | |||
title: On-chain upgrade signaling |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
title: On-chain upgrade signaling | |
title: Onchain upgrade signaling |
I am not an editor. My personal preference is onchain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well noted.
At this point, on-chain is the preferred usage across other publications in this repo.
I'm happy to adopt the less common usage if we can point to it as a best practice.
And either way that should be after merging this as draft.
Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <28278242+abcoathup@users.noreply.github.com>
@g11tech requesting a merge for PR please so this can be discussed as draft |
Hi @g11tech, will you be blocking discussion on this draft, or may it please proceed to draft status? |
Ready for draft, please