-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: do sanity check first #9689
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe update involves refining the transaction processing logic within a specific function. By adjusting the sequence of operations, it now preemptively checks for the presence of transactions in a block, ensuring that an empty block is caught and handled early. This enhancement prevents unnecessary processing efforts on blocks devoid of transactions, streamlining the overall flow and improving error handling. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Not sure how useful this is to be honest, very minimal difference |
Yeah it's just a nit, but I came across this code twice, so I decided to give it a try lol! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will merge this, but these kinds of trivial changes that don't actually affect functionality are taking us more time to review than the value they're really giving. Would be great to focus on PRs that are changing the actual observed behaviour for users in future.
25b01cb
The original implementation won't cause nil pointer error, but I think it's always a good convention to do sanity check first, before accessing .