Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: do sanity check first #9689

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

zhiqiangxu
Copy link
Contributor

The original implementation won't cause nil pointer error, but I think it's always a good convention to do sanity check first, before accessing .

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The update involves refining the transaction processing logic within a specific function. By adjusting the sequence of operations, it now preemptively checks for the presence of transactions in a block, ensuring that an empty block is caught and handled early. This enhancement prevents unnecessary processing efforts on blocks devoid of transactions, streamlining the overall flow and improving error handling.

Changes

File Summary
op-node/rollup/derive/channel_out.go Moved the check for transaction length in BlockToSingularBatch above transaction processing loop to handle empty blocks early.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@tynes
Copy link
Contributor

tynes commented Feb 28, 2024

Not sure how useful this is to be honest, very minimal difference

@zhiqiangxu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah it's just a nit, but I came across this code twice, so I decided to give it a try lol!

Copy link
Contributor

@ajsutton ajsutton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will merge this, but these kinds of trivial changes that don't actually affect functionality are taking us more time to review than the value they're really giving. Would be great to focus on PRs that are changing the actual observed behaviour for users in future.

@ajsutton ajsutton added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 29, 2024
Merged via the queue into ethereum-optimism:develop with commit 25b01cb Feb 29, 2024
68 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants