Fix Updater non-zero _verify->length() once again #8545
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ref. https://github.com/earlephilhower/bearssl-esp8266/blob/6105635531027f5b298aa656d44be2289b2d434f/inc/bearssl_rsa.h#L257 (and should've probably changed the type to size_t)
mcspr
changed the title
d-a-v
reviewed
May 12, 2022
d-a-v
reviewed
May 30, 2022
6 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As mentioned in the #8507 (comment)
I took the liberty to also do some refactoring; specifically, fixing signed vs. unsigned mismatch in len, using pointer object vs. the original manual malloc & free, try to have named constants for certain addresses and lengths, plus localize printing of u8 arrays.
The suggested test to have a 'dummy' verifier works just fine. (...how it actually works and gets the hash to compare with is a whole other question, though)
Another issue noticed while testing, in the underlying bearssl api there's an actual limit for hash length.
https://github.com/earlephilhower/bearssl-esp8266/blob/6105635531027f5b298aa656d44be2289b2d434f/inc/bearssl_rsa.h#L257