Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tolerate leading v in version string #348

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2023
Merged

Tolerate leading v in version string #348

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2023

Conversation

bugadani
Copy link
Contributor

@bugadani bugadani commented Nov 16, 2023

espressif's rustc started including a v in front of the version number with 1.74, like rustc 1.74.0-nightly (bd6bb31df 2023-11-15) (v1.74.0.0)

Copy link
Contributor

@bjoernQ bjoernQ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - was about to create exactly the same PR

@bugadani
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nothing is supposed to use portable-atomic at this point 😭

@MabezDev
Copy link
Member

cc: @georgik was this an intended change?

@bugadani
Copy link
Contributor Author

executor is pinned, CI is green now.

@bjoernQ bjoernQ merged commit 0db7a70 into esp-rs:main Nov 16, 2023
7 checks passed
@bugadani bugadani deleted the version branch November 16, 2023 13:28
@georgik
Copy link

georgik commented Nov 16, 2023

@bugadani Which OS? We needed to build some targets manually, so v might sneaked in.
I guess we can rebuild affected toolchains on Monday.

@bugadani
Copy link
Contributor Author

Windows for me. I actually don't think this is a big deal, the version string already doesn't conform to semver anyway, and now with the workaround I'm fine either way.

@georgik
Copy link

georgik commented Nov 16, 2023

Ok, thank you for the confirmation. Based on other issue we will consider rebuild on Monday.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants