This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 19, 2019. It is now read-only.
Fix: Arrow function body should be ObjectExpression (fixes #331) #334
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
LGTM |
JamesHenry
approved these changes
Jul 10, 2017
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have to ensure we only label ObjectLiteralExpression nodes as ObjectPattern when they have an ancestor of BinaryExpression that is not in an arrow function. There might be a better way. I think ObjectPatterns node can only have ancestors of BinaryExpression and ParthensisExpression but would need more test cases.