docs: Decision docs for start of rewrite #52
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eslint-github-bot
bot
added
the
documentation
fasttime
reviewed
Jun 8, 2024
fasttime
reviewed
Jun 9, 2024
decisions/001-rewrite-core.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe worth linking to the original discussion somewhere for the benefit of new readers?
Co-authored-by: Francesco Trotta <github@fasttime.org>
fasttime
previously approved these changes
Jun 11, 2024
Co-authored-by: Milos Djermanovic <milos.djermanovic@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Milos Djermanovic <milos.djermanovic@gmail.com>
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Formally documents decisions around this repo.
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Added decision documents covering the following:
Related Issues
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
I did my best to piece back together the logic from our various discussions, but do let me know if any important details are missing.