refactor: use release-please to update exported version

[mdjermanovic]

Prerequisites checklist

• I have read the contributing guidelines.

What is the purpose of this pull request?

Simplifies the way eslint-scope and espree are exporting version.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

Removed prepublish step that updates version, and configured release-please to update it similar to how we're doing that in other projects (eslint/rewrite, eslint/json, eslint/markdown, eslint/css). Also added tests that should catch any problems with this when we manage to run CI on release-please PRs (#713).

Related Issues

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

[mdjermanovic]

We're already running build before publishing:

js/.github/workflows/release-please.yml

Lines 44 to 47 in 04247cb

	- run: |
	npm install
	npm run build
	if: ${{ steps.release.outputs.releases_created == 'true' }}

[fasttime]

A note that this could be simplified:

Suggested change

	import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
	import path from "node:path";
	import fs from "node:fs";
	// eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle -- Conventional
	const __dirname = path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
	const { version } = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(`${__dirname}/../package.json`, "utf8"));
	import packageJson from "../package.json" with { type: "json" };
	const { version } = packageJson;

Or, similarly:

Suggested change

	import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
	import path from "node:path";
	import fs from "node:fs";
	// eslint-disable-next-line no-underscore-dangle -- Conventional
	const __dirname = path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
	const { version } = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(`${__dirname}/../package.json`, "utf8"));
	const { default: { version } } = await import("../package.json", { with: { type: "json" } });

Per https://nodejs.org/api/esm.html#import-attributes, import attributes have been supported since Node.js v20.10.0.

[fasttime]

Same note as #714 (comment).

[lumirlumir]

LGTM, thanks! I don't have any further comments.

(I didn't move it to second review needed since there are pending comments.)